Nurses' perceptions of pain management adequacy in mechanically ventilated patients
Asman O., Slutsker E., Melnikov S.
Journal of Clinical Nursing
Vol.28, Issue15-16, P. 2946-2952
Опубликовано: 2019
Тип ресурса: Статья
Аннотация:
Aims and objectives: To examine how nurses' knowledge of behaviours indicating pain in mechanically ventilated patients and self-perceived collaboration between nurses and physicians affects the adequacy of departmental pain management. Background: Pain management is a vital factor of medical treatment in a hospital setting. Inadequate pain management requires attention both from a patient-focused perspective and from a departmental one. It would be particularly troubling in the case of inadequate pain management of mechanically ventilated patients. Design: The study utilised a cross-sectional design. The instruments developed were validated by a focus group of 25 pain management nurses, who reviewed the questionnaire for face validity, feasibility and comprehensibility, and who did not participate in the study. The questionnaire was revised, readjusted and formulated based on their responses and comments. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire administered in Israel with a conveni
Ключевые слова:
interprofessional self-perceived collaboration; mechanically ventilated patient; nursing; pain; pain management; policy; quantitative study
adult; analgesia; article; checklist; clinical practice; controlled study; convenience sample; cross-sectional study; doctor nurse relation; face validity; feasibility study; female; human; internal medicine; Israel; male; nociception; questionnaire; registered nurse; surgical ward; ventilated patient; analgesia; artificial ventilation; information processing; intensive care unit; middle aged; nursing; nursing staff; organization and management; perception; psychology; reproducibility; Adult; Cross-Sectional Studies; Female; Focus Groups; Humans; Intensive Care Units; Israel; Male; Middle Aged; Nursing Staff, Hospital; Pain Management; Perception; Physician-Nurse Relations; Reproducibility of Results; Respiration, Artificial; Surveys and Questionnaires
Язык текста: Английский
ISSN: 1365-2702
Asman O. Oren 1976-
Slutsker E.
Melnikov S.
Асман О. Орен 1976-
Слуцкер Е.
Мелников С.
Nurses' perceptions of pain management adequacy in mechanically ventilated patients
Текст визуальный непосредственный
Journal of Clinical Nursing
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Vol.28, Issue15-16 P. 2946-2952
2019
Статья
interprofessional self-perceived collaboration mechanically ventilated patient nursing pain pain management policy quantitative study
adult analgesia article checklist clinical practice controlled study convenience sample cross-sectional study doctor nurse relation face validity feasibility study female human internal medicine Israel male nociception questionnaire registered nurse surgical ward ventilated patient analgesia artificial ventilation information processing intensive care unit middle aged nursing nursing staff organization and management perception psychology reproducibility Adult Cross-Sectional Studies Female Focus Groups Humans Intensive Care Units Israel Male Middle Aged Nursing Staff, Hospital Pain Management Perception Physician-Nurse Relations Reproducibility of Results Respiration, Artificial Surveys and Questionnaires
Aims and objectives: To examine how nurses' knowledge of behaviours indicating pain in mechanically ventilated patients and self-perceived collaboration between nurses and physicians affects the adequacy of departmental pain management. Background: Pain management is a vital factor of medical treatment in a hospital setting. Inadequate pain management requires attention both from a patient-focused perspective and from a departmental one. It would be particularly troubling in the case of inadequate pain management of mechanically ventilated patients. Design: The study utilised a cross-sectional design. The instruments developed were validated by a focus group of 25 pain management nurses, who reviewed the questionnaire for face validity, feasibility and comprehensibility, and who did not participate in the study. The questionnaire was revised, readjusted and formulated based on their responses and comments. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire administered in Israel with a conveni