Comparative analysis of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting metastatic bone lesions in renal cell carcinoma...
Крючков И. А., Чехонацкайа М. Л., Россоловскy А. Н., Кондрат'ева О. А., Николенко В. Н., Чехонацкиy А. З., Бобyлев Д. А., Чураков А. А., Кондрат'ева Д. А.
Российский электронный журнал лучевой диагностики
Т. 9, Вып. 2, С. 130-132
Опубликовано: 2019
Тип ресурса: Статья
DOI:10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-2-130-132
Аннотация:
Purpose. To compare the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance and computed tomography in the detection of metastatic bone lesions in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Materials and methods. The study involved 11 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with metastatic bone damage. All patients underwent magnetic resonance and computed tomography. Results. The average tumor volume in MRI was 44.1[%] more compared to the average volume in computed tomography (CT), which was both clinically and statistically significant. In 11 of 17 lesions, the volume of metastases was greater on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with the volume on CT. In 6 of 17 lesions, the volumes were comparable in size. Conclusion. Diagnosis of bone metastases of RCC on MRI led to both clinically and statistically significant large volumes compared to measuring the same lesions on CT. MRI more accurately reflects the extent of lesions in metastasis, due to better visualization of bone marrow infiltra
Ключевые слова:
Computed tomography; Magnetic resonance imaging; Metastases; Renal cell carcinoma
Article; bone injury; bone marrow; bone metastasis; clinical article; computer assisted tomography; diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic test accuracy study; human; intermethod comparison; nuclear magnetic resonance imaging; renal cell carcinoma; soft tissue; treatment planning; tumor invasion; tumor volume
Язык текста: Русский
ISSN: 2222-7415
Крючков И. А.
Чехонацкайа М. Л.
Россоловскy А. Н.
Кондрат'ева О. А.
Николенко В. Н. Владимир Николаевич 1956-
Чехонацкиy А. З.
Бобyлев Д. А.
Чураков А. А.
Кондрат'ева Д. А.
Kryuchkov I. A.
Chekhonatskaya M. L.
Rossolovsky A. N.
Kondrat'eva O. A.
Nikolenko V. N. Vladimir Nikolaevich 1956-
Chekhonatskiy A. Z.
Bobylev D. A.
Churakov A. A.
Kondrat'eva D. A.
Comparative analysis of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting metastatic bone lesions in renal cell carcinoma [СРАВНИТЕЛЬНЫЙ АНАЛИЗ ДАННЫХ КОМПЬЮТЕРНОЙ ТОМОГРАФИИ И МАГНИТНО-РЕЗОНАНСНОЙ ТОМОГРАФИИ В ВЫЯВЛЕНИИ МЕТАСТАТИЧЕСКОГО ПОРАЖЕНИЯ КОСТЕЙ ПРИ ПОЧЕЧНО-КЛЕТОЧНОМ РАКЕ]
Comparative analysis of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in detecting metastatic bone lesions in renal cell carcinoma...
Текст визуальный непосредственный
Российский электронный журнал лучевой диагностики
Национальный конгресс лучевых диагностов
Т. 9, Вып. 2 С. 130-132
2019
Статья
Computed tomography Magnetic resonance imaging Metastases Renal cell carcinoma
Article bone injury bone marrow bone metastasis clinical article computer assisted tomography diagnostic accuracy diagnostic test accuracy study human intermethod comparison nuclear magnetic resonance imaging renal cell carcinoma soft tissue treatment planning tumor invasion tumor volume
Purpose. To compare the diagnostic capabilities of magnetic resonance and computed tomography in the detection of metastatic bone lesions in patients with renal cell carcinoma. Materials and methods. The study involved 11 patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with metastatic bone damage. All patients underwent magnetic resonance and computed tomography. Results. The average tumor volume in MRI was 44.1[%] more compared to the average volume in computed tomography (CT), which was both clinically and statistically significant. In 11 of 17 lesions, the volume of metastases was greater on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with the volume on CT. In 6 of 17 lesions, the volumes were comparable in size. Conclusion. Diagnosis of bone metastases of RCC on MRI led to both clinically and statistically significant large volumes compared to measuring the same lesions on CT. MRI more accurately reflects the extent of lesions in metastasis, due to better visualization of bone marrow infiltra