Reliability of palatal rugoscopy for sexual dimorphism in forensic dentistry: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Andrade R. N. M., Vieira W. D. A., Bernardino Í. D. M., Franko D. R. m. A., Paranhos L. R.
Archives of Oral Biology
Vol.97, P. 25-34
Опубликовано: 2019
Тип ресурса: Обзор
DOI:10.1016/j.archoralbio.2018.10.009
Аннотация:
Objective: This study aimed to assess the validity of palatal rugoscopy for sexual dimorphism in the casework routine of forensic dentistry. Design: A systematic literature reviews was established following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines. Six electronic databases were searched as the primary source of information. “Grey literature” was included to avoid selection and publication bias. As a secondary source of information, the reference lists of the eligible studies were also consulted to increase the search spectrum. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews. Statistic tests, namely the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, Cochran Q test, and I2 test, were performed to verify the heterogeneity between the eligible studies. Results: The systematic search resulted in 263 studies, out of each 8 fulfilled the inclusion criteria.
Ключевые слова:
Forensic dentistry; Human identification; Palatal rugoscopy; Sexual dimorphism
area under the curve; data extraction; dentistry; diagnostic accuracy; diagnostic test accuracy study; human; meta analysis; palate; practice guideline; publishing; quantitative analysis; reliability; review; risk assessment; sensitivity and specificity; sex difference; social worker; systematic review; validity; anatomy and histology; dentistry; female; hard palate; male; procedures; reproducibility; sexual characteristics; Female; Forensic Dentistry; Humans; Male; Palate, Hard; Reproducibility of Results; Sex Characteristics
Язык текста: Английский
ISSN: 1879-1506
Andrade R. N. M.
Vieira W. D. A.
Bernardino Í. D. M.
Franko D. R. m. A. Du Rozariu mladshij Ademir 1989-
Paranhos L. R.
Андраде Р. Н. М.
Виеира W. Д. А.
Бернардино Í. Д. М.
Франко Д. Р. м. А. Ду Розариу младший Адемир 1989-
Паранхос Л. Р.
Reliability of palatal rugoscopy for sexual dimorphism in forensic dentistry: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis
Текст визуальный непосредственный
Archives of Oral Biology
Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.
Vol.97 P. 25-34
2019
Обзор
Forensic dentistry Human identification Palatal rugoscopy Sexual dimorphism
area under the curve data extraction dentistry diagnostic accuracy diagnostic test accuracy study human meta analysis palate practice guideline publishing quantitative analysis reliability review risk assessment sensitivity and specificity sex difference social worker systematic review validity anatomy and histology dentistry female hard palate male procedures reproducibility sexual characteristics Female Forensic Dentistry Humans Male Palate, Hard Reproducibility of Results Sex Characteristics
Objective: This study aimed to assess the validity of palatal rugoscopy for sexual dimorphism in the casework routine of forensic dentistry. Design: A systematic literature reviews was established following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) and Cochrane guidelines. Six electronic databases were searched as the primary source of information. “Grey literature” was included to avoid selection and publication bias. As a secondary source of information, the reference lists of the eligible studies were also consulted to increase the search spectrum. Methodological quality and risk of bias were assessed with Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools for Systematic Reviews. Statistic tests, namely the meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy, Cochran Q test, and I2 test, were performed to verify the heterogeneity between the eligible studies. Results: The systematic search resulted in 263 studies, out of each 8 fulfilled the inclusion criteria.