Monopolar enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for small- and medium-sized (< 80 cc) benign prostate hyperplasia: a...

Enikeev D. V., Rapoport L. M., Gazimiev M. A., Allenov S. N., Inoyatov J., Taratkin M. S., Laukhtina E. A., Sung J. M., Okhunov Z., Gly'bochko P. V.

World Journal of Urology

Vol.38, Issue1, P. 167-173

Опубликовано: 2020

Тип ресурса: Статья

DOI:10.1007/s00345-019-02757-z

Аннотация:

Aim: To assess efficacy and safety of monopolar enucleation of the prostate (MEP) and to compare it with the current treatment standard for medium-sized prostates, < 80 cc, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Methods: A prospective analysis patients undergoing a surgical procedure for their diagnosis of BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia) (IPSS > 20, Qmax < 10; prostate volume < 80 cc) was performed. IPSS, Qmax were assessed preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The complications were classified according to the modified Clavien–Dindo grading system. Results: A total of 134 patients were included in the study: 70 underwent MEP and 64 - TURP for BPH (mean prostate volumes were comparable with p = 0.163). The mean surgery time was 44 min in the TURP group and 48.2 min in the MEP group, (p = 0.026). Catheterization time for MEP was 1.7 and 3.2 days for TURP (p < 0.001). Hospital stay for MEP was 3.2 days vs. 4.8 days for TURP (p < 0.001). Both te

Ключевые слова:

BPH; EEP; Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate; MEP; Monopolar; TURP

Язык текста: Английский

ISSN: 1433-8726

Enikeev D. V. Dmitrij Viktorovich 1982-

Rapoport L. M. Leonid Moiseevich 1956-

Gazimiev M. A. Magomed-Salakh Alkhazurovich 1967-

Allenov S. N. Sergej Nikolaevich 1968-

Inoyatov J.

Taratkin M. S. Mark Sergeevich 1993-

Laukhtina E. A. Ekaterina Aleksandrovna 1995-

Sung J. M.

Okhunov Z.

Gly'bochko P. V. Petr Vitalyevich 1964-

Еникеев Д. В. Дмитрий Викторович 1982-

Рапопорт Л. М. Леонид Моисеевич 1956-

Газимиев М. А. Магомед-Салах Алхазурович 1967-

Алленов С. Н. Сергей Николаевич 1968-

Иноятов Й.

Тараткин М. С. Марк Сергеевич 1993-

Лаухтина Е. А. Екатерина Александровна 1995-

Сунг Й. М.

Охунов З.

Глыбочко П. В. Петр Витальевич 1964-

Monopolar enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for small- and medium-sized (< 80 cc) benign prostate hyperplasia: a prospective analysis

Monopolar enucleation versus transurethral resection of the prostate for small- and medium-sized (< 80 cc) benign prostate hyperplasia: a...

Текст визуальный непосредственный

World Journal of Urology

Springer-Verlag GmbH

Vol.38, Issue1 P. 167-173

2020

Статья

BPH EEP Endoscopic enucleation of the prostate MEP Monopolar TURP

Aim: To assess efficacy and safety of monopolar enucleation of the prostate (MEP) and to compare it with the current treatment standard for medium-sized prostates, < 80 cc, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). Methods: A prospective analysis patients undergoing a surgical procedure for their diagnosis of BPH (benign prostatic hyperplasia) (IPSS > 20, Qmax < 10; prostate volume < 80 cc) was performed. IPSS, Qmax were assessed preoperatively, at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. The complications were classified according to the modified Clavien–Dindo grading system. Results: A total of 134 patients were included in the study: 70 underwent MEP and 64 - TURP for BPH (mean prostate volumes were comparable with p = 0.163). The mean surgery time was 44 min in the TURP group and 48.2 min in the MEP group, (p = 0.026). Catheterization time for MEP was 1.7 and 3.2 days for TURP (p < 0.001). Hospital stay for MEP was 3.2 days vs. 4.8 days for TURP (p < 0.001). Both te