Role of anti-DNA auto-antibodies as biomarkers of response to treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: hypes and hopes. Insights and...
Bragazzi N. L., Watad A., Damiani G., Adawi M., Amital H., Shenfel`d I. Yu.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
Vol.19, Issue11, P. 969-978
Опубликовано: 2019
Тип ресурса: Обзор
DOI:10.1080/14737159.2019.1665511
Аннотация:
Introduction: Due to the polymorphic clinical presentations and manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), biomarkers with enough diagnostic and prognostic value are of paramount importance. Recently, anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) auto-antibodies have been proposed to monitor the response to different therapies. It has also been suggested that they should be employed as entry markers in trial studies. However, their clinical use remains still debated and, sometimes, controversial, due to conflicting findings reported. Areas covered: Through an extensive literature review, we evaluated changes in anti-dsDNA auto-antibodies levels before and after the administration of the treatment (either biological or non-biological). Expert opinion: Anti-dsDNA auto-antibodies related findings are still difficult to compare mainly because of the different detecting methods employed, even though in most studies included in this review a consistent decreasing pattern after the treatme
Ключевые слова:
Anti-DNA auto-antibodies; Biologics; Biomarker; Systemic Lupus Erythematosus; Therapeutic response
amg 811; anifrolumab; atacicept; autoantibody; belimumab; blisibimod; bortezomib; cyclophosphamide; cyclosporine; DNA antibody; glucocorticoid; immunoglobulin; immunomodulating agent; mycophenolate mofetil; rituximab; sifalimumab; tabalumab; tacrolimus; tocilizumab; unclassified drug; vitamin D; antinuclear antibody; immunosuppressive agent; pharmacological biomarker; alternative medicine; biological therapy; disease burden; human; Review; stem cell transplantation; systematic review; systemic lupus erythematosus; treatment response; vitamin supplementation; blood; systemic lupus erythematosus; Antibodies, Antinuclear; Biomarkers, Pharmacological; Humans; Immunosuppressive Agents; Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Язык текста: Английский
ISSN: 1744-8352
Bragazzi N. L.
Watad A.
Damiani G.
Adawi M.
Amital H.
Shenfel`d I. Yu. Ieguda Yulius 1948-
Брагаззи Н. Л.
Wатад А.
Дамиани Г.
Адаwи М.
Амитал Х.
Шенфельд И. Ю. Иегуда Юлиус 1948-
Role of anti-DNA auto-antibodies as biomarkers of response to treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: hypes and hopes. Insights and implications from a comprehensive review of the literature
Role of anti-DNA auto-antibodies as biomarkers of response to treatment in systemic lupus erythematosus patients: hypes and hopes. Insights and...
Текст визуальный непосредственный
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics
Future Drugs Ltd.
Vol.19, Issue11 P. 969-978
2019
Обзор
Anti-DNA auto-antibodies Biologics Biomarker Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Therapeutic response
amg 811 anifrolumab atacicept autoantibody belimumab blisibimod bortezomib cyclophosphamide cyclosporine DNA antibody glucocorticoid immunoglobulin immunomodulating agent mycophenolate mofetil rituximab sifalimumab tabalumab tacrolimus tocilizumab unclassified drug vitamin D antinuclear antibody immunosuppressive agent pharmacological biomarker alternative medicine biological therapy disease burden human Review stem cell transplantation systematic review systemic lupus erythematosus treatment response vitamin supplementation blood systemic lupus erythematosus Antibodies, Antinuclear Biomarkers, Pharmacological Humans Immunosuppressive Agents Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
Introduction: Due to the polymorphic clinical presentations and manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), biomarkers with enough diagnostic and prognostic value are of paramount importance. Recently, anti-double stranded DNA (anti-dsDNA) auto-antibodies have been proposed to monitor the response to different therapies. It has also been suggested that they should be employed as entry markers in trial studies. However, their clinical use remains still debated and, sometimes, controversial, due to conflicting findings reported. Areas covered: Through an extensive literature review, we evaluated changes in anti-dsDNA auto-antibodies levels before and after the administration of the treatment (either biological or non-biological). Expert opinion: Anti-dsDNA auto-antibodies related findings are still difficult to compare mainly because of the different detecting methods employed, even though in most studies included in this review a consistent decreasing pattern after the treatme