Biofabrication: A Guide to Technology and Terminology
Moroni L., Boland T., Burdick J. A., De M. C., Derby B., Forgacs G., Groll J., Li Q., Malda J., Mironov V. A., Mota C., Nakamura M., Shu W., Takeuchi S., Woodfield T. B. F., Xu T., Yoo J. J., Vozzi G.
Trends in Biotechnology
Vol.36, Issue4, P. 384-402
Опубликовано: 2018
Тип ресурса: Обзор
DOI:10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.10.015
Аннотация:
Biofabrication holds the potential to generate constructs that more closely recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of tissues and organs than do currently available regenerative medicine therapies. Such constructs can be applied for tissue regeneration or as in vitro 3D models. Biofabrication is maturing and growing, and scientists with different backgrounds are joining this field, underscoring the need for unity regarding the use of terminology. We therefore believe that there is a compelling need to clarify the relationship between the different concepts, technologies, and descriptions of biofabrication that are often used interchangeably or inconsistently in the current literature. Our objective is to provide a guide to the terminology for different technologies in the field which may serve as a reference for the biofabrication community. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd
Ключевые слова:
Biomimetics; Histology; Manufacture; Physiological models; Regenerative Medicine; Terminology; Three dimensional computer graphics; Tissue; 3D models; Biofabrication; Biomimicry; Complex tissues; In-vitro models; Spatial resolution; Terminology framework; Time-scales; Tissue regeneration; biomaterial; biomaterial; polymer; biocompatibility; bioengineering; biofabrication; bioprinting; biotechnology; cell encapsulation; electrospinning; extracellular matrix; hybrid cell; hydrogel; microfluidics; particle size; polymerization; priority journal; Review; three dimensional printing; tissue engineering; tissue regeneration; animal; animal model; chemistry; human; multicellular spheroid; nomenclature; regenerative medicine; tissue engineering; Animals; Biocompatible Materials; Humans; Hydrogels; Microfluidics; Models, Animal; Polymers; Printing, Three-Dimensional; Regenerative Medicine; Spheroids, Cellular; Terminology as Topic; Tissue Engineering
Язык текста: Английский
ISSN: 0167-7799
Moroni L.
Boland T.
Burdick J. A.
De M. C. Maria C.
Derby B.
Forgacs G.
Groll J.
Li Q.
Malda J.
Mironov V. A. Vladimir Aleksandrovich 1954-
Mota C.
Nakamura M.
Shu W.
Takeuchi S.
Woodfield T. B. F.
Xu T.
Yoo J. J.
Vozzi G.
Морони Л.
Боланд Т.
Бурдиcк Й. А.
Де М. C. Мариа C.
Дербy Б.
Форгаcс Г.
Гролл Й.
Ли Q.
Малда Й.
Миронов В. А. Владимир Александрович 1954-
Мота C.
Накамура М.
Шу W.
Такеучи С.
Wоодфиелд Т. Б. Ф.
Ху Т.
Ёо Й. Й.
Воззи Г.
Biofabrication: A Guide to Technology and Terminology
Текст визуальный непосредственный
Trends in Biotechnology
Elsevier Science Publisher B.V.
Vol.36, Issue4 P. 384-402
2018
Обзор
Biomimetics Histology Manufacture Physiological models Regenerative Medicine Terminology Three dimensional computer graphics Tissue 3D models Biofabrication Biomimicry Complex tissues In-vitro models Spatial resolution Terminology framework Time-scales Tissue regeneration biomaterial biomaterial polymer biocompatibility bioengineering biofabrication bioprinting biotechnology cell encapsulation electrospinning extracellular matrix hybrid cell hydrogel microfluidics particle size polymerization priority journal Review three dimensional printing tissue engineering tissue regeneration animal animal model chemistry human multicellular spheroid nomenclature regenerative medicine tissue engineering Animals Biocompatible Materials Humans Hydrogels Microfluidics Models, Animal Polymers Printing, Three-Dimensional Regenerative Medicine Spheroids, Cellular Terminology as Topic Tissue Engineering
Biofabrication holds the potential to generate constructs that more closely recapitulate the complexity and heterogeneity of tissues and organs than do currently available regenerative medicine therapies. Such constructs can be applied for tissue regeneration or as in vitro 3D models. Biofabrication is maturing and growing, and scientists with different backgrounds are joining this field, underscoring the need for unity regarding the use of terminology. We therefore believe that there is a compelling need to clarify the relationship between the different concepts, technologies, and descriptions of biofabrication that are often used interchangeably or inconsistently in the current literature. Our objective is to provide a guide to the terminology for different technologies in the field which may serve as a reference for the biofabrication community. © 2017 Elsevier Ltd