Postoperative complications of minimally invasive therapies for prostate cancer

Еникеев Д. В., Рапопорт Л. М., Амосов А. В., Еникеев М. Э., Чинёнов Д. В., Снурницына О. В., Герасимов А. Н., Джалаев З. К., Гаас М. Я., Лаухтина Е. А., Тараткин М. С.

Онкоурология

Т. 14, Вып. 3, С. 43-50

Опубликовано: 2018

Тип ресурса: Статья

DOI:10.17650/1726-9776-2018-14-3-43-50

Аннотация:

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men. Radical prostatectomy (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) remains the main method of surgical treatment for prostate cancer. However, minimally invasive therapies for prostate cancer are becoming increasingly popular in recent years, because they have similar efficacy as open surgery. The most studied minimally invasive therapies are cryoablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and brachytherapy. Despite the minimization of damage to neighboring structures, minimally invasive procedures can cause a number of complications, like any other surgical interventions. Each method has specific limitations and the most typical complications. Since multiple minimally invasive methods are currently available, we can ensure an individual approach to each particular patient, thus using the advantages of the methods and avoiding possible complications. This article covers the most frequent and severe complications of minimally invasive the

Ключевые слова:

Ablation; Brachytherapy; Complication; Cryoablation; HIFU therapy; Minimally invasive therapy; Prostate cancer

Язык текста: Русский

ISSN: 1996-1812

Еникеев Д. В. Дмитрий Викторович 1982-

Рапопорт Л. М. Леонид Моисеевич 1956-

Амосов А. В. Александр Валентинович 1953-

Еникеев М. Э. Михаил Эликович 1974-

Чинёнов Д. В. Денис Владимирович 1978-

Снурницына О. В. Олеся Вячеславовна 1992-

Герасимов А. Н. Андрей Николаевич 1958-

Джалаев З. К. Зураб Курбанмагомедович 1991-

Гаас М. Я. Маргарита Яковлевна 1995-

Лаухтина Е. А. Екатерина Александровна 1995-

Тараткин М. С. Марк Сергеевич 1993-

Enikeev D. V. Dmitrij Viktorovich 1982-

Rapoport L. M. Leonid Moiseevich 1956-

Amosov A. V. Aleksandr Valentinovich 1953-

Enikeev M. E`. Mikhail E`likovich 1974-

Chinyonov D. V. Denis Vladimirovich 1978-

Snurnitsy'na O. V. Olesya Vyacheslavovna 1992-

Gerasimov A. N. Andrej Nikolaevich 1958-

Dzhalaev Z. K. Zurab Kurbanmagomedovich 1991-

Gaas M. Ya. Margarita Yakovlevna 1995-

Laukhtina E. A. Ekaterina Aleksandrovna 1995-

Taratkin M. S. Mark Sergeevich 1993-

Postoperative complications of minimally invasive therapies for prostate cancer

Текст визуальный непосредственный

Онкоурология

Издательский дом "АБВ-пресс"

Т. 14, Вып. 3 С. 43-50

2018

Статья

Ablation Brachytherapy Complication Cryoablation HIFU therapy Minimally invasive therapy Prostate cancer

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer among men. Radical prostatectomy (open, laparoscopic, or robotic) remains the main method of surgical treatment for prostate cancer. However, minimally invasive therapies for prostate cancer are becoming increasingly popular in recent years, because they have similar efficacy as open surgery. The most studied minimally invasive therapies are cryoablation, high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), and brachytherapy. Despite the minimization of damage to neighboring structures, minimally invasive procedures can cause a number of complications, like any other surgical interventions. Each method has specific limitations and the most typical complications. Since multiple minimally invasive methods are currently available, we can ensure an individual approach to each particular patient, thus using the advantages of the methods and avoiding possible complications. This article covers the most frequent and severe complications of minimally invasive the