Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: advantages and disadvantages [Odnoportovaya laparoskopicheskaya kholetsistektomiya: preimushchestva i...
Алекберзаде А. В. О., Липницкy Е. М., Крылов Н. Н., Сундуков И. В., Бадалов Д. А.
Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова
Вып. 11, С. 19-24
Опубликовано: 2016
Тип ресурса: Статья
DOI:10.17116/hirurgia20161119-24
Аннотация:
AIM: To analyze the outcomes of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Early and long-term postoperative period has been analyzed in 240 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCE) including 120 cases of single-port technique and 120 cases of four-port technique. Both groups were compared in surgical time, pain syndrome severity (visual analog scale), need for analgesics, postoperative complications, hospital-stay, daily activity recovery and return to physical work, patients' satisfaction of surgical results and their aesthetic effect.RESULTS: It was revealed that single-port LCE is associated with lower severity of postoperative pain, quick recovery of daily activity and return to physical work, high satisfaction of surgical results and their aesthetic effect compared with four-port LCE. Disadvantages of single-port LCE include longer duration of surgery, high incidence of postoperative umbilical hernia. However hernia was predominantly observed
Ключевые слова:
human; laparoscopic cholecystectomy; length of stay; operation duration; pain measurement; postoperative pain; procedures; treatment outcome; Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic; Humans; Length of Stay; Operative Time; Pain Measurement; Pain, Postoperative; Treatment Outcome
Язык текста: Русский
ISSN: 2309-5628
Алекберзаде А. В. О. Афтандил Вагиф Оглы 1970-
Липницкy Е. М.
Крылов Н. Н. Николай Николаевич 1956-
Сундуков И. В.
Бадалов Д. А.
Alekberzade A. V. O. Aftandil Vagif Ogly' 1970-
Lipnitsky E. M.
Kry'lov N. N. Nikolay Nikolaevich 1956-
Sundukov I. V.
Badalov D. A.
Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: advantages and disadvantages [Odnoportovaya laparoskopicheskaya kholetsistektomiya: preimushchestva i nedostatki]
Single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy: advantages and disadvantages [Odnoportovaya laparoskopicheskaya kholetsistektomiya: preimushchestva i...
Текст визуальный непосредственный
Хирургия. Журнал им. Н.И. Пирогова
Издательство Медиа Сфера
Вып. 11 С. 19-24
2016
Статья
human laparoscopic cholecystectomy length of stay operation duration pain measurement postoperative pain procedures treatment outcome Cholecystectomy, Laparoscopic Humans Length of Stay Operative Time Pain Measurement Pain, Postoperative Treatment Outcome
AIM: To analyze the outcomes of single-port laparoscopic cholecystectomy.MATERIAL AND METHODS: Early and long-term postoperative period has been analyzed in 240 patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LCE) including 120 cases of single-port technique and 120 cases of four-port technique. Both groups were compared in surgical time, pain syndrome severity (visual analog scale), need for analgesics, postoperative complications, hospital-stay, daily activity recovery and return to physical work, patients' satisfaction of surgical results and their aesthetic effect.RESULTS: It was revealed that single-port LCE is associated with lower severity of postoperative pain, quick recovery of daily activity and return to physical work, high satisfaction of surgical results and their aesthetic effect compared with four-port LCE. Disadvantages of single-port LCE include longer duration of surgery, high incidence of postoperative umbilical hernia. However hernia was predominantly observed