Alyaev Y.G. Yu G
Rapoport L.M.
Enikeev M.E.
Bezrukov E.S.
Shpot E.V.
Korolev D.O.
Fokin I.V.
Marisov L.V.
Research Institute of Uronephrology and Human Reproductive Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow.
Radical prostatectomy in patients with incident prostate cancer
Текст визуальный электронный
Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)
№ 2 С. 63-66
2016
functional results
incident prostate cancer
localized prostate cancer
postoperative complications
radical prostatectomy
transurethral resection of the prostate
Статья
Aged M01.060.116.100
Пожилые M01.060.116.100
Female
Женский
Humans B01.050.150.900.649.313.988.400.112.400.400
Человек B01.050.150.900.649.313.988.400.112.400.400
Incidence E05.318.308.985.525.375 N01.224.935.597.500 N06.850.505.400.975.525.375 N06.850.520.308.985.525.375
Заболеваемость, новые случаи E05.318.308.985.525.375 N01.224.935.597.500 N06.850.505.400.975.525.375 N06.850.520.308.985.525.375
Male
Мужской
Middle Aged M01.060.116.630
Средний возраст M01.060.116.630
Prostatectomy E04.950.774.860.625
Простатэктомия E04.950.774.860.625
Prostatic Neoplasms epidemiology C04.588.945.440.770 C12.100.500.260.750 C12.100.500.565.625 C12.200.294.260.750 C12.200.294.565.625 C12.200.758.409.750 C12.900.619.750
Prostatic Neoplasms surgery C04.588.945.440.770 C12.100.500.260.750 C12.100.500.565.625 C12.200.294.260.750 C12.200.294.565.625 C12.200.758.409.750 C12.900.619.750
Предстательной железы новообразования эпидемиология C04.588.945.440.770 C12.100.500.260.750 C12.100.500.565.625 C12.200.294.260.750 C12.200.294.565.625 C12.200.758.409.750 C12.900.619.750
Предстательной железы новообразования хирургия C04.588.945.440.770 C12.100.500.260.750 C12.100.500.565.625 C12.200.294.260.750 C12.200.294.565.625 C12.200.758.409.750 C12.900.619.750
Journal Article V02.600
Журнальная статья V02.600
The problem of detecting localized prostate cancer following transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia is fairly common. Historically, radical prostatectomy (RP) after previously performed TURP was associated with poor surgical and functional outcomes. It is believed that the periprostatic fibrosis, scar tissue and inflammation after previous TURP may interfere with the optimal RP results. The present retrospective study evaluates intraoperative characteristics, postoperative oncological and functional outcomes of RP in patients with a history of TURP.