Akhvlediani N.D.
Shvarts P.G.
Kirichuk Y.V. Ya V
I.M. Sechenov First MSMU of Minzdrav of Russia Moscow, Russia.
Research Center of Neurology, Moscow, Russia.
Erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
Текст визуальный электронный
Urologiia (Moscow, Russia : 1999)
№ 6 С. 149-152
2017
erectile dysfunction
nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy
prostate cancer
Статья
Обзор
Erectile Dysfunction C12.100.500.214 C12.100.875.486 C12.200.294.214 F03.835.400
Erectile Dysfunction etiology C12.100.500.214 C12.100.875.486 C12.200.294.214 F03.835.400
Erectile Dysfunction prevention & control C12.100.500.214 C12.100.875.486 C12.200.294.214 F03.835.400
Эректильная дисфункция C12.100.500.214 C12.100.875.486 C12.200.294.214 F03.835.400
Эректильная дисфункция этиология C12.100.500.214 C12.100.875.486 C12.200.294.214 F03.835.400
Эректильная дисфункция профилактика и контроль C12.100.500.214 C12.100.875.486 C12.200.294.214 F03.835.400
Humans B01.050.150.900.649.313.988.400.112.400.400
Человек B01.050.150.900.649.313.988.400.112.400.400
Male
Мужской
Postoperative Complications prevention & control C23.550.767
Послеоперационные осложнения профилактика и контроль C23.550.767
Prostatectomy E04.950.774.860.625
Prostatectomy adverse effects E04.950.774.860.625
Prostatectomy methods E04.950.774.860.625
Простатэктомия E04.950.774.860.625
Простатэктомия вредные воздействия E04.950.774.860.625
Простатэктомия методы E04.950.774.860.625
Prostatic Neoplasms surgery C04.588.945.440.770 C12.100.500.260.750 C12.100.500.565.625 C12.200.294.260.750 C12.200.294.565.625 C12.200.758.409.750 C12.900.619.750
Предстательной железы новообразования хирургия C04.588.945.440.770 C12.100.500.260.750 C12.100.500.565.625 C12.200.294.260.750 C12.200.294.565.625 C12.200.758.409.750 C12.900.619.750
Journal Article V02.600
Журнальная статья V02.600
Review V02.600.500 V02.912
Обзор V02.600.500 V02.912
Nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy remains the optimal curative treatment of prostate cancer in patients who want to maintain erectile function. Since its development, there has been a gradual decline in its effectiveness concerning the prevention of ED, which was associated with the currently more objective assessment of erectile function at both the pre- and post-operative stage. There is a knowledge gap in the precise understanding of which specific neural structures should be preserved with the nerve-sparing technique. At the same time, there have been proposed effective methods for visualizing the elements of the preserved vascular-neural bundle and estimating the degree of nerve-sparing.